Not every command is able to completely execute in a single ACID transaction. A very common example that pops up quite often as an argument for transactions is the money transfer. It is often believed that an atomic and consistent transaction is absolutely required to transfer money from one account to another. Well, it's not. On the contrary, it is quite impossible to do. What if money is transferred from an account on Bank A, to another account on Bank B? Does Bank A acquire a lock in Bank B's database? If the transfer is in progress, is it strange that Bank A has deducted the amount, but Bank B hasn't deposited it yet? Not really, it's "underway". On the other hand, if something goes wrong while depositing the money on Bank B's account, Bank A's customer would want his money back. So we do expect some form of consistency, ultimately.
While ACID transactions are not necessary or even impossible in some cases, some form of transaction management is still required. Typically, these transactions are referred to as BASE transactions: Basic Availability, Soft state, Eventual consistency. Contrary to ACID, BASE transactions cannot be easily rolled back. To roll back, compensating actions need to be taken to revert anything that has occurred as part of the transaction. In the money transfer example, a failure at Bank B to deposit the money, will refund the money in Bank A.
In CQRS, Sagas are responsible for managing these BASE transactions. They respond on Events produced by Commands and may produce new commands, invoke external applications, etc. In the context of Domain Driven Design, it is not uncommon for Sagas to be used as coordination mechanism between several bounded contexts.
A Saga is a special type of Event Listener: one that manages a business transaction. Some transactions could be running for days or even weeks, while others are completed within a few milliseconds. In Axon, each instance of a Saga is responsible for managing a single business transaction. That means a Saga maintains state necessary to manage that transaction, continuing it or taking compensating actions to roll back any actions already taken. Typically, and contrary to regular Event Listeners, a Saga has a starting point and an end, both triggered by Events. While the starting point of a Saga is usually very clear, while there could be many ways for a Saga to end.
In Axon, all Sagas must implement the Saga
interface. As with Aggregates,
there is a Saga implementation that allows you to annotate event handling methods: the
AbstractAnnotatedSaga
.
As a single Saga instance is responsible for managing a single transaction. That means you need to be able to indicate the start and end of a Saga's Life Cycle.
The AbstractAnnotatedSaga
allows you to annotate Event Handlers with
an annotation (@SagaEventHandler
). If a specific Event signifies the
start of a transaction, add another annotation to that same method:
@StartSaga
. This annotation will create a new saga and invoke its
event handler method when a matching Event is published.
By default, a new Saga is only started if no suitable existing Saga (of the same
type) can be found. You can also force the creation of a new Saga instance by
setting the forceNew
property on the @StartSaga
annotation
to true
.
Ending a Saga can be done in two ways. If a certain Event always indicates the end
of a Saga's life cycle, annotate that Event's handler on the Saga with
@EndSaga
. The Saga's Life Cycle will be ended after the invocation
of the handler. Alternatively, you can call end()
from inside the Saga
to end the life cycle. This allows you to conditionally end the Saga.
Note | |
---|---|
If you don't use annotation support, you need to properly configure your Saga
Manager (see Section 7.2.1, “Saga Manager” below). To end a Saga's life cycle,
make sure the |
Event Handling in a Saga is quite comparable to that of a regular Event Listener. The same rules for method and parameter resolution are valid here. There is one major difference, though. While there is a single instance of an Event Listener that deals will all incoming events, multiple instances of a Saga may exist, each interested in different Events. For example, a Saga that manages a transaction around an Order with Id "1" will not be interested in Events regarding Order "2", and vice versa.
Instead of publishing all Events to all Saga instances (which would be a complete
waste of resources), Axon will only publish Events containing properties that the
Saga has been associated with. This is done using AssociationValue
s. An
AssociationValue
consists of a key and a value. The key represents
the type of identifier used, for example "orderId" or "order". The value represents
the corresponding value, "1" or "2" in the previous example.
The @SagaEventHandler
annotation has two attributes, of which
associationProperty
is the most important one. This is the name of
the property on the incoming Event that should be used to find associated Sagas. The
key of the association value is the name of the property. The value is the value
returned by property's getter method.
For example, consider an incoming Event with a method "String
getOderId()
", which returns "123". If a method accepting this Event
is annotated with @SagaEventHandler(associationProperty="orderId")
,
this Event is routed to all Sagas that have been associated with an
AssociationValue
with key "orderId" and value "123". This may
either be exactly one, more than one, or even none at all.
Sometimes, the name of the property you want to association is not the name of
the association you want to use. For example, you have a Saga that matches Sell
orders against Buy orders, you could have a Transaction object that contains the
"buyOrderId" and a "sellOrderId". If you want the saga to associate that value
as "orderId", you can define a different keyName in the
@SagaEventHandler
annotation. It would then become
@SagaEventHandler(associationProperty="sellOrderId",
keyName="orderId")
When a Saga manages a transaction around one or more domain concepts, such as Order, Shipment, Invoice, etc, that Saga needs to be associated with instances of those concepts. An association requires two parameters: the key, which identifies the type of association (Order, Shipment, etc) and a value, which represents the identifier of that concept.
Associating a Saga with a concept is done in several ways. First of all, when
a Saga is newly created when invoking a @StartSaga
annotated Event
Handler, it is automatically associated with the property identified in the
@SagaEventHandler
method. Any other association can be created
using the associateWith(String key, String/Number value)
method.
Use the removeAssociationWith(String key, String/Number value)
method to remove a specific association.
Imagine a Saga that has been created for a transaction around an Order. The
Saga is automatically associated with the Order, as the method is annotated with
@StartSaga
. The Saga is responsible for creating an Invoice for
that Order, and tell Shipping to create a Shipment for it. Once both the
Shipment have arrived and the Invoice has been paid, the transaction is
completed and the Saga is closed.
Here is the code for such a Saga:
public class OrderManagementSaga extends AbstractAnnotatedSaga { private boolean paid = false; private boolean delivered = false; private transient CommandGateway commandGateway; @StartSaga @SagaEventHandler(associationProperty = "orderId") public void handle(OrderCreatedEvent event) { // client generated identifiers ShippingId shipmentId = createShipmentId(); InvoiceId invoiceId = createInvoiceId(); // associate the Saga with these values, before sending the commands associateWith("shipmentId", shipmentId); associateWith("invoiceId", invoiceId); // send the commands commandGateway.send(new PrepareShippingCommand(...)); commandGateway.send(new CreateInvoiceCommand(...)); } @SagaEventHandler(associationProperty = "shipmentId") public void handle(ShippingArrivedEvent event) { delivered = true; if (paid) { end(); } } @SagaEventHandler(associationProperty = "invoiceId") public void handle(InvoicePaidEvent event) { paid = true; if (delivered) { end(); } } // ... }
By allowing clients to generate an identifier, a Saga can be easily associated with a concept, without the need to a request-response type command. | |
We associate the event with these concepts before publishing the command. This way, we are guaranteed to also catch events generated as part of this command. | |
This will end this saga once the invoice is paid and the shipment has arrived. |
Of course, this Saga implementation is far from complete. What should happen if the invoice is not paid in time. What if the shipment cannot be delivered? The Saga should be able to cope with those scenarios as well.
The order in which @SagaEventHandler
annotated methed are
evaluated is similar to that of @EventHandler
methods (see Section 6.2.2, “Annotated Event Handler”). However, unlike
@EventHandler
methods, you may have multiple
@SagaEventHandler
methods for the same event type. In that
case, the number of parameters defines the evaluation order of the method, where
the largest number of parameters comes first. A method matches if the parameters
of the handler method match the incoming Event, and if the saga has an
association with the property defined on the handler method. When two methods
have the same number of arguments, the order is undefined.
It is easy to make a Saga take action when something happens. After all, there is an Event to notify the Saga. But what if you want your Saga to do something when nothing happens? That's what deadlines are used for. In invoices, that's typically several weeks, while the confirmation of a credit card payment should occur within a few seconds.
In Axon, you can use an EventScheduler
to schedule an Event for
publication. In the example of an Invoice, you'd expect that invoice to be paid
within 30 days. A Saga would, after sending the CreateInvoiceCommand
,
schedule an InvoicePaymentDeadlineExpiredEvent
to be published in 30
days. The EventScheduler returns a ScheduleToken
after scheduling an
Event. This token can be used to cancel the schedule, for example when a payment of
an Invoice has been received.
Axon provides two EventScheduler implementations: a pure Java one and one using Quartz 2 as a backing scheduling mechanism.
This pure-Java implementation of the EventScheduler
uses a
ScheduledExecutorService
to schedule Event publication.
Although the timing of this scheduler is very reliable, it is a pure in-memory
implementation. Once the JVM is shut down, all schedules are lost. This makes
this implementation unsuitable for long-term schedules.
The SimpleEventScheduler
needs to be configured with an
EventBus
and a SchedulingExecutorService
(see the
static methods on the java.util.concurrent.Executors
class for
helper methods).
The QuartzEventScheduler
is a more reliable and enterprise-worthy
implementation. Using Quartz as underlying scheduling mechanism, it provides
more powerful features, such as persistence, clustering and misfire management.
This means Event publication is guaranteed. It might be a little late, but it
will be published.
It needs to be configured with a Quartz Scheduler
and an
EventBus
. Optionally, you may set the name of the group that
Quartz jobs are scheduled in, which defaults to "AxonFramework-Events".
One or more components will be listening for scheduled Events. These
components might rely on a Transaction being bound to the Thread that invokes
them. Scheduled Events are published by Threads managed by the
EventScheduler
. To manage transactions on these threads, you
can configure a TransactionManager
or
aUnitOfWorkFactory
that creates Transaction Bound Unit of
Work.
Note | |
---|---|
Spring users can use the |
Sagas generally do more than just maintaining state based on Events. They interact with external components. To do so, they need access to the Resources necessary to address to components. Usually, these resources aren't really part of the Saga's state and shouldn't be persisted as such. But once a Saga is reconstructed, these resources must be injected before an Event is routed to that instance.
For that purpose, there is the ResourceInjector
. It is used by the
SagaRepository
(for existing Saga instances) and the
SagaFactory
(for newly created instances) to inject resources into
a Saga. Axon provides a SpringResourceInjector
, which injects annotated
fields and methods with Resources from the Application Context, and a
SimpleResourceInjector
, which detects setters and injects resources
which have been registered with it.
Mark fields holding injected resources transient | |
---|---|
Since resources should not be persisted with the Saga, make sure to add the
|
The SimpleResourceInjector
uses, as the name suggests, a simple
mechanism to detect required resources. It scans the methods of a Saga to find
one that starts with "set" and contains a single parameter, of a type that
matches with of its known resources.
The SimpleResourceInjector
is initialized with a collection of
objects that a Saga may depend on. If a Saga has a setter method (name starts
with "set" and has a single parameter) in which a resource can be passed, it
will invoke that method.
The SpringResourceInjector
uses Spring's dependency injection
mechanism to inject resources into an aggregate. This means you can use setter
injection or direct field injection if you require. The method or field to be
injected needs to be annotated in order for Spring to recognize it as a
dependency, for example with @Autowired
.
Note that when you use the Axon namespace in Spring to create a Saga
Repository or Saga Manager, the SpringResourceInjector
is
configured by default. For more information about wiring Sagas with Spring, see
Section 9.9, “Configuring Sagas”.
Events need to be redirected to the appropriate Saga instances. To do so, some
infrastructure classes are required. The most important components are the
SagaManager
and the SagaRepository
.
The SagaManager
is responsible for redirecting Events to the
appropriate Saga instances and managing their life cycle. There are two
SagaManager
implementations in Axon Framework: the
AnnotatedSagaManager
, which provides the annotation support and the
SimpleSagaManager
, which is less powerful, but doesn't force you
into using annotations.
Sagas operate in a highly concurrent environment. Multiple Events may reach a Saga
at (nearly) the same time. This means that Sagas need to be thread safe. By default,
Axon's SagaManager
implementations will synchronize access to a Saga
instance. This means that only one thread can access a Saga at a time, and all
changes by one thread are guaranteed to be visible to any successive threads (a.k.a
happens-before order in the Java Memory Model). Optionally, you may switch this
locking off, if you are sure that your Saga is completely thread safe on its own.
Just setSynchronizeSagaAccess(false)
. When disabling synchronization,
do take note of the fact that this will allow a Saga to be invoked while it is in
the process of being stored by a repository. The result may be that a Saga is stored
in an inconsistent state first, and overwritten by it's actual state later.
This is by far the least powerful of the two implementations, but it doesn't
require the use of annotations. The SimpleSagaManager
needs to be
configured with a number of resources. Its constructor requires the type of Saga
it manages, the SagaRepository
, an
AssociationValueResolver
, a SagaFactory
and the
EventBus
. The AssociationValueResolver
is a
component that returns a Set
of AssociationValue
for a
given Event.
Then, you should also configure the types of Events the SagaManager should
create new instances for. This is done through the
setEventsToAlwaysCreateNewSagasFor
and
setEventsToOptionallyCreateNewSagasFor
methods. They both
accept a List of Event classes.
This SagaManager implementation uses annotations on the Sagas themselves to manage the routing and life cycle of that Saga. As a result, this manager allows all information about the life cycle of a Saga to be available inside the Saga class itself. It can also manage any number of saga types. That means only a single AnnotatedSagaManager is required, even if you have multiple types of Saga.
The AnnotatedSagaManager
is constructed using a SagaRepository, a
SagaFactory (optional) and a vararg array of Saga classes. If no
SagaFactory
is provided, a GenericSagaFactory
is
used. It assumes that all Saga classes have a public no-arg constructor.
If you use Spring, you can use the axon
namespace to configure an
AnnotatedSagaManager
. The supported Saga types are provided as
a comma separated list, or using component scanning by providng a package name.
This will also automatically configure a SpringResourceInjector
,
which injects any annotated fields with resources from the Spring Application
Context.
<axon:saga-manager id="sagaManager" saga-factory="optionalSagaFactory" saga-repository="sagaRepository" event-bus="eventBus"> <axon:types> fully.qualified.ClassName, another.fq.ClassName </axon:types> </axon:saga-manager> <axon:saga-manager id="scanningSagaManager" base-package="package.to.scan" saga-repository="sagaRepostory" event-bus="eventBus"> <axon:types> some.more.SagaClasses </axon:types> </axon:saga-manager/>
As with Event Listeners, it is also possible to asynchronously handle events
for sagas. To handle events asynchronously, the SagaManager needs to be
configured with an Executor
implementation. The
Executor
supplies the threads needed to process the events
asynchronously. Often, you'll want to use a thread pool. You may, if you want,
share this thread pool with other asynchronous activities.
When an executor is provided, the SagaManager will automatically use it to find associated Saga instances and dispatch the events each of these instances. The SagaManager will guarantee that for each Saga instance, all events are processed in the order they arrive. For optimization purposes, this guarantee does not count in between Sagas.
Because Transactions are often Thread bound, you may need to configure a Transaction Manager with the SagaManager. This transaction manager is invoked before and after each invocation to the Saga Repository and before and after each batch of Events has been processed by the Saga itself.
In a Spring application context, a Saga Manager can be marked as asynchronous
by adding the executor
and optionally the
transaction-manager
attributes to the saga-manager
element, as shown below. The processor-count
attribute defines the
number of threads that should process the
sagas.
<axon:saga-manager id="sagaManager" saga-factory="optionalSagaFactory" saga-repository="sagaRepository" event-bus="eventBus"> <axon:async processor-count="10" executor="myThreadPool" transaction-manager="txManager"/> <axon:types> fully.qualified.ClassName, another.fq.ClassName </axon:types> </axon:saga-manager>
The
transaction-manager should point to a PlatformTransactionManager
,
Spring's interface for transaction managers. Generally you can use the same
transaction manager as the other components in your application (e.g.
JpaTransactionManager
).
Exceptions while processing Events | |
---|---|
Since the processing is asynchronous, Exceptions cannot be propagated to the components publishing the Event. Exceptions raised by Sagas while handling an Event are logged and discarded. When an exception occurs while persisting Saga state, the SagaManager will retry persisting the Saga at a later stage. If there are incoming Events, they are processed using the in-memory representation, re-attemtping the persistence later on. When shutting down the application, the SagaManager will do a final attempt to persist the Sagas to their repository, and give up if it does not succeed, allowing the application to finish the shutdown process. |
The SagaRepository
is responsible for storing and retrieving Sagas,
for use by the SagaManager
. It is capable of retrieving specific Saga
instances by their identifier as well as by their Association Values.
There are some special requirements, however. Since concurrency in Sagas is a very delicate procedure, the repository must ensure that for each conceptual Saga instance (with equal identifier) only a single instance exists in the JVM.
Axon provides three SagaRepository
implementations: the
InMemorySagaRepository
, the JpaSagaRepository
and the
MongoSagaRepository
.
As the name suggests, this repository keeps a collection of Sagas in memory. This is the simplest repository to configure and the fastest to use. However, it doesn't provide any persistence. If the JVM is shut down, any stored Saga is lost. This implementation is particularly suitable for testing and some very specialized use cases.
The JpaSagaRepository
uses JPA to store the state and Association
Values of Sagas. Saga's do no need any JPA annotations; Axon will serialize the
sagas using a Serializer
(similar to Event serialization, you can
use either a JavaSerializer
or an
XStreamSerializer
).
The JpaSagaRepository is configured with a JPA EntityManager
, a
ResourceInjector
and a Serializer
. Optionally, you
can choose whether to explicitly flush the EntityManager
after each
operation. This will ensure that data is sent to the database, even before a
transaction is committed. the default is to use explicit flushes.
The JdbcSagaRepository
uses plain JDBC to store stage instances
and their association values. Similar to the JpaSagaRepository
,
Saga instances don't need to be aware of how they are stored. They are
serialized using a Serializer.
The JdbcSagaRepository
is configured with a
ConnectionProvider
, which can simply be a
DataSource
wrapped in a
DataSourceConnectionProvider
, a ResourceInjector
and a Serializer
. While not required, it is recommended to use a
UnitOfWorkAwareConnectionProviderWrapper
. It will check the
current Unit of Work for an already open database connection. This will ensure
that all activity within a unit of work is done on a single connection.
Unlike JPA, the JdbcSagaRepository uses plain SQL statement to store and
retrieve information. This may mean that some operations depend on the Database
specific SQL dialect. It may also be the case that certain Database vendors
provide non-standard features that you would like to use. To allow for this, you
can provide your own SagaSqlSchema
. The SagaSqlSchema
is an interface that defines all the operations the repository needs to perform
on the underlying database. It allows you to customize the SQL statement
executed for each one of them. The default is the
GenericSagaSqlSchema
.
Similar to the JpaSagaRepository
, the
MongoSagaRepository
stores the Saga instances and their
associations in a database. The MongoSagaRepository
stores sagas in
a single Collection in a MongoDB database. Per Saga instance, a single document
is created.
The MongoSagaRepository also ensures that at any time, only a single Saga instance exists for any unique Saga in a single JVM. This ensures that no state changes are lost due to concurrency issues.
If a database backed Saga Repository is used, saving and loading Saga instances may be a relatively expensive operation. Especially in situations where the same Saga instance is invoked multiple times within a short timespan, a cache can be beneficial to the application's performance.
Axon provides the CachingSagaRepository
implementation. It is a Saga
Repository that wraps another repository, which does the actual storage. When
loading Sagas or Association Values, the CachingSagaRepository
will
first consult its caches, before delegating to the wrapped repository. When storing
information, all call are always delegated, to ensure that the backing storage
always has a consistent view on the Saga's state.
To configure caching, simply wrap any Saga repository in a
CachingSagaRepository
. The constructor of the CachingSagaRepository
takes three parameters: the repository to wrap and the caches to use for the
Association Values and Saga instances, respectively. The latter two arguments may
refer to the same cache, or to different ones. This depends on the eviction
requirements of your specific application.
Cache API compatibility warning | |
---|---|
The Cache API has only been recently defined. As at the moment Axon was developed, the most recent version of the specification was not implemented, version 0.5 has been used. This API version is implemented by EhCache-JCache version "1.0.5-0.5". Axon 2.1 has been tested against this version. In a future version of Axon, the 1.0 version of the Cache API will be implemented, if the Cache providers have done that migration as well. Until then, you might have to select your cache implementation version carefully. |
Spring users can use the <axon:cache-config>
element to add
caching behavior to a <axon:jpa-saga-repository>
element. It is
configured with two cache references (which may refer to the same cache): one
which stores the cached Saga instances, and one that stores the
associations.
<axon:jpa-saga-repository id="cachingSagaRepository"> <axon:cache-config saga-cache="sagaCacheRef" associations-cache="associationCacheRef"/> </axon:jpa-saga-repository>